MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2002287427 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-3847

Abstract 3847: Cytoplasmic ECT2: Implications for invasion and migration and RAS-RAC cross-talk in glioma

2011· article· en· W2002287427 on OpenAlexaff
Adrienne Weeks, Nadia Okolowsky, Stacey Ivanchuk, James T. Rukta

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRHOACDC42RAC1GliomaBiologyCell biologyCytoplasmCancer researchSmall GTPasePhenotypeCell migrationActinCellSignal transductionGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gliomas are a highly malignant primary brain tumour characterized by their adept ability to invade normal brain parenchyma. We have previously identified the cytoplasmic and normally nuclear sequestered pro-cytokinetic, small cytoskeletal GTPase ECT2 to be involved in the invasive process of malignant glioma. ECT2 shows dysregulated spatial regulation in malignant gliomas with increased cytoplasmic expression, in particular at the leading edge of invading primary glioma cells. This aberrant ECT2 plays a role in RAC1 and CDC42 activation, as shRNA mediated loss of ECT2 leads to no effect on cell cycle, but a less invasive phenotype and diminished RAC1 and CDC42 levels. Using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry we identified the novel RAS-GAP, RASAL2 as a significant cytoplasmic interactor with ECT2 in gliomas. We show this interaction represents a mechanism by which RAS (which is aberrantly activated in gliomas) can cross-talk with the RAC/RHO pathway and coordinate growth and invasion of gliomas. Over-expression of ECT2 leads to mesenchymal-amoeboid transition (MAT) in glioma cells. Cells expressing GFP-ECT2 show hyperactive cortical dynamics with the formation of membrane blebs, similar to an amoeboid phenotype. ECT2 localized to the cortical blebs during retraction in a similar manner to active RHOA in amoeboid cells. It is known that MAT relies on an antagonistic relationship between RHOA (pro-amoeboid) and RAC1 (promesenchymal). We tested whether our phenotype was mediated by RHOA or RAC1 by administration of the RHOA downstream inhibitor of ROCK, Y27632 and RAC1 NSC23766. RHOA pathway inhibition by Y27632 at 25uM was able to reverse this hypercortical activity and resulted in formation of lamellipodia, as seen with RAC1 activation. NSC23766 was unable to abolish the amoeboid phenotype in concentrations of up to 100uM. A proportion of GFP-ECT2 amoeboid cells were capable of migrating at velocities of up to 10 um/sec. Interestingly, although loss of ECT2 has no phenotypic changes in cells plated in a 2D context, loss of ECT2 by shRNA in cells plated within a collagen matrix show marked reduction in amoeboid phenotype. The ability of glioma cells to undergo MAT is a relatively new concept, however well documented in other cancer subtypes such as melanoma. The molecular switches involved in MAT remain elusive, however our data reveals a potential role for ECT2 in migratory phenotype switching. Importantly, when a stably expressing ECT2 shRNA glioma line is orthotopically injected into mouse brains, these ECT2 knockdown xenografts exhibit enhanced survival and diminished tumour engraftment as compared to controls. Taken together, this suggests that ECT2 is a viable target for malignant gliomas. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3847. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-3847

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→