MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Core Anatomy – Illustrated ‐ By I. Parkin, B. M. Logan and M. McCarthy

2007· article· en· W2002295831 on OpenAlexaff
G.H. Sperber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Anatomy · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnatomy and Medical Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnatomyComputer scienceArt historyArtComputer graphics (images)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Anatomy – Illustrated By Parkin, I., Logan, B. M. and McCarthy, M. . London : Hodder Arnold . ISBN: 9780340809181 (paperback) 186 + xiv pp.; 180 illustrations . 2007 . £19.99 . Into the crowded field of currently available atlases,* there comes a newcomer that avoids the title of ‘Atlas’, but serves the role of illustrating anatomy. The stated purpose of this new contribution to the long list of anatomical treatises is that it is tailored to the realities of ‘a substantial reduction in course curricula hours dedicated to the learning of anatomy’. Consequently, it is a highly condensed colour key-coded descriptive account of topographical anatomy divided into nine parts, head to toe. Each part has been assigned a different upper-border colour, creating a colour mnemonic that could act as an aide-memoire. The layout is innovative in arranging a text on the left-hand pages corresponding to superbly photographed highly skilled dissections on the facing right-hand pages of each double-page spread. The text is highly correlated with the illustrations by numerical references identified on both sides of the page spread, and further enhanced by coloured print highlighting nomenclature, corresponding to the border colour of each body part. Thus, the text reads like a spectral rainbow of changing hues consistent with the border coloured body parts that undoubtedly enhance the pedagogical value of this work. A further feature is the clinical emphasis that is highlighted in the text by a sans-serif font with a pointing hand icon in the margin to draw the reader's eye. This succinct volume comprises 71 double-page spreads, printed on high-quality glossy paper. Unfortunately, the paper binding might not withstand too much page spreading before disintegrating. Another major drawback is the lack of cross-sectional views that are the essence of computerized tomography (CAT) scans with which clinicians now view anatomy. Nor are any radiographs included. The limited bibliography precludes its use as a source of reference material, with the only web-based source cited being http://www.anatsoc.org.uk, neglecting the numerous websites available for anatomical information (http://www.scholar.google.com). This book, in brief, is a synoptic atlas, bypassing elaboration, which will provide a tool for examination ‘cramming’ of facts that require a broader background for full understanding of a complex subject. *These include the Netter Atlas of Human Anatomy, Gray's Atlas of Human Anatomy, McMinn's Clinical Atlas of Human Anatomy, and Moses et al.'s Atlas of Clinical Gross Anatomy (all published by Elsevier); the Kopf-Maier Atlas of Human Anatomy (Karger); the Clemente Atlas of Anatomy, Grant's Atlas of Anatomy, and the LWW Atlas of Anatomy (all published by Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins); and the Thieme Atlas of Anatomy (published by Thieme).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AnatomySame topicAnatomy and Medical TechnologyFrench-language works237,207