Multichannel quantum defect theory treatment of triplet gerade and ungerade <i>d</i>-symmetry levelsof H<sub>2</sub> and its isotopomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents a systematic multichannel quantum defect theory (MQDT) analysis of the triplet d-symmetry levels of the hydrogen molecule. First, a new compilation of the best available experimental term values for these levels was prepared. Second, R-dependent quantum defect matrices for the 3Πu, 3Πg, and 3Δg states of H2 were obtained from ab initio potential-energy curves and used in an ab initio MQDT calculation of all known triplet d-symmetry rovibronic levels of H2, HD, and D2. For a few of these levels previous ab initio calculations have been reported. The agreement currently obtained is generally significantly better than that in previous work. Finally, the quantum defect matrices are used to calculate the electronic transition moments 3Πu [Formula: see text] 3Πg, 3Δg as functions of energy and internuclear distance, R, for application in a companion article. PACS Nos: 31.15Ar, 33.20Wr, 34.10+x, 34.80Kw
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".