MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002316438 · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.023804

Compact optical one-way waveguide isolators for photonic-band-gap microchips

2008· article· en· W2002316438 on OpenAlexafffund
Hiroyuki Takeda, Sajeev John

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsOptical isolatorGroup velocityOpticsFaraday effectWaveguideSlow lightPhotonic crystalPhotonicsMagnetic fieldOptical fiberQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In two-dimensional (2D) photonic crystals (PC's), we demonstrate compact optical waveguide isolators in which light can propagate only one way. Waveguides are composed of magneto-optical materials with magnetic domain walls. Magneto-optical effects and magnetic domain walls break time-reversal and space-inversion symmetries, respectively, leading to nonreciprocal waveguides with different group velocities for forward and backward propagating light of a given frequency. When backward light has a zero group velocity, only forward light can be transmitted while backward light stops. Slow leakage of backward light (when the group velocity is not precisely zero) is eliminated by introducing absorption loss in nonreciprocal PC waveguides. Then, absorption of forward light is less than that of backward light. Introducing gain material and signal amplification by current injection, forward light can propagate with no net loss and only backward light is attenuated. We demonstrate that backward light, with nearly zero group velocity, can be eliminated because of absorption over a long effective optical path length. This enables compact on-chip photonic band-gap isolators. The waveguide isolator is assumed to be composed of europium oxide with the Faraday rotation angle of ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{F}=3.49\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{3}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{rad}∕\mathrm{cm}$ at wavelength $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$ under a magnetic field $0.9\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{Tesla}$. In a waveguide isolator with the length of $8.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$, transmittance of backward light is mostly zero at a specific frequency when transmittance of forward light is amplified to 1 by current injection. The usable bandwidth is up to $12\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{nm}$ centered at $1.5\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\text{micron}$ wavelength as the device length is increased $(L=42.6\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m})$. We demonstrate similar results for an asymmetric nonreciprocal waveguide without a magnetic domain wall. The possibility of compact on-chip photonic band-gap isolators is demonstrated for 2D membrane photonic crystals with finite thickness in the third dimension. Computations are performed using plane wave expansion, finite difference time domain, and optical Wannier function methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations117
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207