Characterization of a fluorescent conjugate of the rabbit angiotensin AT<sub>1</sub> receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. The rabbit AT(1) receptor (AT(1)R) for angiotensin II (A(II)) has been conjugated to the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in order to establish the pharmacological profile of such a fusion protein and to facilitate the study of ligand-induced regulation. 2. A(II) bound AT(1)R-YFP (K(D) 8.1 nM in transiently transfected cells) and stimulated HEK 293 cells expressing the fusion protein at concentration ranges similar to the ones that stimulate the contraction of the isolated rabbit aorta. Antagonists found to be insurmountable in the latter assay (candesartan and EXP-3174 being the most extreme cases) were also insurmountable in the phospholipase A(2) assay applied to cells expressing AT(1)R-YFP, whereas losartan appeared to be surmountable in both assays. 3. Cells expressing AT(1)R-YFP exhibited a membrane-associated fluorescence that was partly and reversibly translocated into intracellular structures upon A(II) stimulation (confocal microscopy); the nonpeptide antagonists were not active in this respect, but prevented the effect of the agonist. 4. A(II) treatment increased the quantity of the fusion protein in cells, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) treatment even more so (immunoblot, confocal microscopy) but, unlike the agonist, the latter drug did not induce receptor endocytosis. A protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor prevented the effect of either A(II) or PMA on AT(1)R-YFP abundance. 5. The conjugate AT(1)R-YFP retains the pharmacological properties of the parent rabbit AT(1)R. Agonist-induced downregulation was not documented using this system; to the contrary, we have observed a PKC-mediated increased expression AT(1)R-YFP likely to be the result of a decreased breakdown rate of the fusion protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".