MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2002327779 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n5p74

The Connotation and Development Path of the Integration of Preschool Education

2014· article· en· W2002327779 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liangying Yang, Jing Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnotationChinaGovernment (linguistics)LegislationMechanism (biology)IncentiveService (business)Realization (probability)Political scienceEconomic growthPedagogyMathematics educationPsychologyBusinessEconomicsMarketingLawMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Education Integration is the fundamental experience of the world’s preschool education development and alsothe strategetic objective of China. The essence of China’s preschool education is energetic, healthy andsustainable and connotative progress. The basic methods are as follows: Fortifying the reform of educationsystem to promote the realization of education integration in the city and the country; enlisting educationobjectives and contents to build educational network service and implement integration of education and serviceunder the guidance of the government; Accelerating pre-school education legislation and improving teachers’qualification examination system to establish incentive mechanism to consummate childcare integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social Science→Same topicHigher Education and Teaching Methods→French-language works237,207→