Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Managers of the six North American neutron experimental facilities (Intense Pulsed Neutron Source (IPNS) at Argonne National Laboratory, Center for Neutron Research at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Neutron Program for Materials Research of the National Research Council Canada (NRC-CNRC), High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) and the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) of Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) at Los Alamos National Laboratory) attended the inaugural meeting of the Neutron Facilities Roundtable at Los Alamos National Laboratory in January 2003. The Snteragency Working Group of the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy recommended periodic meetings of the neutron facilities in their June 2002 report on the Status and Needs of Major Neutron Scattering Facilities in the United States (the report is available at http://www.ostp.gov/html/neutron.pdf).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".