New Tertiary Phosphines from Cinnamaldehydes and Diphenylphosphine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 1:1 hydrophosphination of the olefinic bond of cinnamaldehyde (and substituted ones) with Ph2PH, under argon using neat reagents, gives quantitative formation of the new tertiary phosphines Ph2PCH(Ar)CH2CHO (2) as racemic mixtures (Ar = Ph, p-tol, and p-OMe-C6H4). alpha-Methylcinnamaldehyde similarly affords Ph2PCH(Ph)CH(Me)CHO, but as a mixture of diastereomers with predominantly S,S- and R,R-chirality [diastereomeric ratio (dr) approximately 20]. In a 2:1 reaction of Ph2PH with cinnamaldehyde, hydrophosphination of both the C=C and C=O bonds takes place to give the diphosphine derivative Ph2PCH(Ph)CH2CH(OH)PPh2 (3) as a diastereomeric mixture with dr approximately 2.3. In most organic solvents, the hydrophosphination of the C=O group is reversible, leading to a dynamic equilibrium between 3 and 2, but 3 is stable in coordinating solvents such as DMSO, DMF, and pyridine. X-ray analysis of a P,P-chelated PdCl2(3) complex, formed from trans-PdCl2(PhCN)2 and 3 in MeOH, reveals that the S,S/R,R-enantiomers are favored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".