MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002358808 · doi:10.1145/1089444.1089503

A real-time transport protocol for image-based rendering over heterogeneous wireless networks

2005· article· en· W2002358808 on OpenAlexaff
Azzedine Boukerche, Tingxue Huang, Richard W. Pazzi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRendering (computer graphics)RTP Control ProtocolProtocol (science)MorphingWirelessWireless networkReal-time computingComputer networkComputer graphics (images)Network packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the recent development of wireless communications and multimedia systems, 3D image-based scenes with photo-realistic rendered images and rendering performance have recently received a great deal of interests.In this paper, we focus upon 3D scenes streaming over heterogeneous wireless communication networks, and we propose a real-time transport protocol for streaming 3D scenes based rendered by image morphing. Our approach is based upon 2D images (i.e., subfunction of plenoptic function) which are taken as a representation of 3D scenes while the view morphing is used to render new images. Based on these assumptions, we have designed the real-time transport protocol (RTP) payload format and packetization schemes for streaming 3D image-based scenes. Furtheremore, in order to enhance the robutness of our streaming mechanism, a special packetization scheme has been developed and a feedback mechanism is proposed to deal wih the drastic changes of the wireless network bandwidth using a periodic feedback schema within the Real-time Control Protocol (RTCP).We discuss our proposed protocol and present an extensive set of simulation experiments to evaluate the performance of our protocol using a variery of real world senarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207