MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002360188 · doi:10.4141/cjss06033

A modular terrain model for daily variations in machine-specific forest soil trafficability

2009· article· en· W2002360188 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicForest Biomass Utilization and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrainRutEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceSoil textureWater contentBulk densitySoil waterHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineeringGeologyGeographyAsphalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modular approach is presented to assess terrain-specific soil trafficability in terms of soil resistance to penetration and machine-specific rut depths. These modules address: (1) soil resistance to cone penetration (cone index, or CI) as affected by soil moisture, texture and pore space (Module 1), (2) machine-induced rut depths (single-pass and multi-cycles) as affected by wheel loads, tire specifications and CI (accounting for depth of compactable soil, Module 2), (3) temporal variations in hydrothermal conditions, CI, and potential rut depths due to daily soil moisture and temperature variations (Module 3), and (4) spatial variations in CI and rut depth across terrain due to corresponding changes in soil moisture, depth of compactable soil, bulk density, texture, frost depth, organic matter and coarse fragments (Module 4). The approach is applied to off-road wood-forwarding operations. Modules 1 and 2 were calibrated to apply to a wide range of soil conditions. Modules 3 and 4 were initialized for a wood-forwarding case study at CFB Gagetown, New Brunswick, Canada. Model results should be most applicable for flat to near-flat terrain, with insignificant wheel obstructions, and no organic matter accumulations on top of the mineral soil. Key words: Forest harvesting, soil penetration resistance, cone index, soil rut depth, soil disturbance, soil trafficability, soil compaction, terrain modelling

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it