MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002380367 · doi:10.1063/1.1924392

The effect of ion drift on the sheath, presheath, and ion-current collection for cylinders in a collisionless plasma

2005· article· en· W2002380367 on OpenAlexaff
John Charles McMahon, G. Xu, J. G. Laframboise

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPlasmaDebye lengthDebye sheathIonAtomic physicsRADIUSPoisson's equationCurrent (fluid)Computational physicsMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A calculation is presented of the behavior of the sheath and presheath surrounding an infinite cylindrical conducting object, representing a spacecraft or electrostatic probe, which is moving transversely through a collisionless plasma, such as is encountered in the ionosphere. The calculation is done by solving the coupled Vlasov (collisionless Boltzmann) and Poisson equations in an iterative manner. The results show that for some ratios of probe radius to electron Debye length, the ion current collected by the probe in a drifting plasma can be less than that collected in a nondrifting plasma. These changes in the current-collection behavior can be linked to changes that occur in the sheath and presheath with plasma drift, including at large enough drift speeds the disappearance or “collapse” of the presheath.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207