MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002428112 · doi:10.7202/009222ar

Le monde de Moncton, Moncton ville du monde

2004· article· fr· W2002428112 on OpenAlex
Benoît Doyon-Gosselin, Jean Morency

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente étude, qui s’appuie sur les concepts de ville-tableau et de ville-sculpture proposés par Bertrand Westphal, porte sur l’inscription des villes de Moncton et Dieppe dans Pas pire (1998), Un fin passage (2001) et Petites difficultés d’existence (2002). Ces romans témoignent d’une vision à la fois utopique et ironique de la ville. Pas pir e propose une cartographie extrêmement originale des deux villes limitrophes, cartographie qui s’inscrit dans une réflexion sur les différentes catégories de l’espace, ainsi que dans une méditation sur le temps et la mémoire. Dans Petites difficulté s d’existence , les personnages façonnent la ville de manière singulière, en rénovant un vieux bâtiment qui devient la métaphore d’un Moncton moderne et ouvert sur le monde. De la sorte, Moncton devient une ville transcendant ses propres limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it