MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002469747 · doi:10.7202/043596ar

Entre l'efficience de Justinien et la justice de Locke

2005· article· fr· W2002469747 on OpenAlex
Roderick A. Macdonald

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aujourd'hui, il est courant de qualifier les rapports humains les plus importants comme étant les rapports économiques. Les économies nationales subissent toutes sortes de perturbations économiques (des perturbations naturelles, résultant de décisions politiques ou encore de nouvelles technologies. Nos gouvernements sont appelés à y répondre. Doivent-ils laisser ces changements s'effectuer d'eux-mêmes ou résister à ceux-ci ? Doivent-ils tenter de les freiner ou au contraire les faciliter ? Il est clair qu'il n'existe pas de réponse unique applicable dans toutes les circonstances. Chacune des situations particulières exigera la recherche d'un équilibre entre l'efficience économique et la justice sociale. Il ne faut pas présumer que la notion de justice dans le domaine juridique peut se réduire à la simple notion d'efficacité économique. Et il ne convient pas non plus de supposer que la notion de justice dans le domaine économique peut se limiter à la simple recherche de la richesse maximale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it