MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis: does the evidence support a causal or contributory role?

2001· review· en· W2002487744 on OpenAlexafffund
James B. Mahony, Brian K. Coombes

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsImmune systemChlamydiaInflammationImmunologyChlamydophila pneumoniaeChemokineBiologyCrosstalkMedicineChlamydiaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intracellular bacterial pathogen Chlamydia pneumoniae causes respiratory tract infection and has been associated with atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. Since atherosclerosis is a progressive disease and is considered to be a chronic inflammation of the artery vessel wall, the interaction of C. pneumoniae with cells of the vasculature that can result in a local inflammatory response is of paramount importance. In this essay we review the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis in the context of C. pneumoniae infection and present an integrated model that includes the involvement of C. pneumoniae in all stages of atherogenesis including initiation, inflammation, fibrous plaque formation, plaque rupture and thrombosis. We hypothesize that acute and persistent infection of professional immune cells (T-cells, monocytes and macrophages) and non-immune cells (endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells) contributes to a sustained inflammatory response mediated by extensive cellular 'crosstalk' and numerous cytokines/chemokines. This cascade of inflammatory mediators may contribute to cellular dysfunction and tissue remodelling of the arterial intima. An improved understanding of the precise mechanism(s) of C. pneumoniae involvement in atherogenesis may help resolve the question of causality however, at the present time, we interpret the data as favoring a contributory rather than a causal role. Future research directed at the discovery of chlamydial virulence factors necessary for intracellular survival and subsequent alterations in host cell gene expression including signalling pathways may be important for the design of future clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207