Wireless local area network service providers’ price competition in presence of heterogeneous user demand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consider wireless local area network (WLAN) service providers (SPs) operating in an overlapping service area. The SPs compete with each other to attract users. The price charged is utilised by the SPs as a tool to maximise revenue, resulting in a price competition between the WLAN SPs. The users are assumed to be selfish, trying to maximise their individual utility. They have varied sensitivity towards quality of service experienced and the price charged. In such a scenario, the user demand distribution is the one that achieves Wardrop equilibrium. Approximate analytical expressions are obtained for the best response of SPs to each other's price. Existence of a Nash equilibrium (NE) between the competing SPs is proved and the price vector at which the NE occurs is obtained. It is found that, while in one extreme monopoly leads to very high revenue for WLAN SPs with minimal consumer surplus, in the other extreme unregulated duopoly/oligopoly leads to high consumer surplus at the cost of minimal revenue generation for the competing SPs. Thus, price regulation is proposed in the WLAN market for equitable distribution of the surplus among the SPs and the users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".