A Strategic Empty Container Logistics Optimization in a Major Shipping Company
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present a system that Compañía Sud Americana de Vapores (CSAV), one of the world's largest shipping companies, developed to support its decisions for repositioning and stocking empty containers. CSAV's main business is shipping cargo in containers to clients worldwide. It uses a fleet of about 700,000 TEU containers of different types, which are carried by both CSAV-owned and third-party ships. Managing the container fleet is complex; CSAV must make thousands of decisions each day. In particular, imbalances exist among the regions. For example, China often has a deficit of empty containers and is a net importer; Saudi Arabia often has a surplus and is a net exporter. CSAV and researchers from the University of Chile developed the Empty Container Logistics Optimization System (ECO) to manage this imbalance. ECO's multicommodity, multiperiod model manages the repositioning problem, whereas an inventory model determines the safety stock required at each location. CSAV uses safety stock to ensure high service levels despite uncertainties, particularly in the demand for containers. A hybrid forecasting system supports both the inventory and the multicommodity network flow model. Major improvements in data gathering, real-time communications, and automation of data handling were needed as input to the models. A collaborative Web-based optimization framework allows agents from different zones to interact in decision making. The use of ECO led to direct savings of $81 million for CSAV, a reduction in inventory stock of 50 percent, and an increase in container turnover of 60 percent. Moreover, the system helped CSAV to become more efficient and to overcome the 2008 economic crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".