Computer-aided Spatial Classification of Epileptic Spikes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The authors present a method that can be used to identify exemplar spikes from prolonged EEG recordings. To achieve this they have calculated single dipole source models for each automatically detected spike-like waveform. They used a dipole source algorithm that is computationally light and can be run on-line during EEG acquisition. Although a single dipole source model may not provide anatomically accurate information about the location of generators of all epileptiform abnormalities, it does provide a novel spatial parameter that may be useful in its own right. The authors use this spatial parameter and present the relative spatial density of the dipole locations in the form of three planar projections of the spherical model (a view from above, a view from the right, and a view from behind) and allow users to define the x-, y-, and z-coordinates of points of interest within the spherical model. They then present 10 example waveforms of events that have dipole source model locations that occur close to that seed coordinate. Overall, they found that this method performs very well for frequent events, but does not perform well for rare events or for diffuse EEG abnormalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".