MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002520499 · doi:10.1139/cjc-78-6-925

Synthesis of dimeric and tetrameric macrolactams with cytotoxic activity<sup>1</sup>

2000· article· en· W2002520499 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gabriella Gentile, Daniela Fattori, Maurizio Botta, Federico Corelli, Domenico Fusar-Bassini, Doriano Lamba

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTaxoidStereochemistryTaxaneDocetaxelCytotoxicityCytotoxic T cellPaclitaxelSide chainIn vitroOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyclization of amino acid 14, in turn prepared from 4,4-dimethylcyclohex-2-en-1-one by standard chemistry, yielded the dimeric and tetrameric macrolactams 15 and 16, respectively, representing the first examples of "taxoid-like" compounds with heterocyclic B rings. Compounds 15 and 16 exhibited moderate antiproliferative activity in an in vitro cytotoxicity assay. Consequently, an orthogonally diprotected, dimeric macrolactam 19 was synthesized and, after selective deprotection of the hydroxy group, was coupled with the docetaxel side chain to give the final compound 2, showing three-dimensional shape similarity to paclitaxel. Contrary to our expectations, 2 proved to be as active as the parent compound 15. The structure of 15 has been confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis and is also reported.Key words: macrolactams, macrocyclic compounds, taxane analogs, cytotoxic activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207