A 167-ps 2.34-mW Single-Cycle 64-Bit Binary Tree Comparator With Constant-Delay Logic in 65-nm CMOS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A single-cycle tree-based 64-bit binary comparator with constant-delay (CD) logic realized in a 65-nm, 1-V CMOS process is presented in this paper. Unlike dynamic logic yet domino-compatible, CD logic predischarges the output to logic “0” and conditionally makes a transition to logic “1” through the critical-path CLK PMOS transistors for an NMOS transistor network. The constant delay (regardless of the fan-in) feature makes it up to 2× faster than a dynamic logic gate during the D-Q mode for a complex logic such as a two-bit binary comparator. The proposed comparator's architecture is divided into two stages, where the first stage adapts a novel tree comparator structure specifically designed for static logic to achieve low-power consumption and the second stage utilizes CD logic to realize high performance without sacrificing the overall energy efficiency. At 1-V supply, the proposed comparator's measured delay is 167 ps, and has an average power and a leakage power of 2.34 mW and 0.06 mW, respectively. At 0.3-pJ iso-energy or 250-ps iso-delay budget, the proposed comparator with CD logic is 20% faster or 17% more energy-efficient compared to a comparator implemented with just the static logic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it