MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002530614 · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/20/5/055013

Characterization of surface micro forces under varying operational conditions in micro-sized object pushing: an empirical approach

2010· article· en· W2002530614 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Shahini, William Melek, John T. W. Yeow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAdvanced Micro Devices
Keywordsvan der Waals forceCharacterization (materials science)Capillary actionMaterials scienceSubstrate (aquarium)Work (physics)Surface forceScalingAtomic force microscopyMechanicsNanotechnologySurface (topology)Shear forceMechanical engineeringComposite materialEngineeringPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this paper is to analyze the surface scaling forces which are present at the interface between micro objects and a substrate. Experiments conducted in this work characterize the aggregated micro forces including capillary and van der Waals forces. These forces collectively form the interfacial shear strength in between the flat micro components and a flat substrate during the process of micro scale object pushing. The relationship between the magnitude of surface forces and parameters such as velocity of pushing, relative humidity and temperature, hydrophilicity of the substrate and surface area are also empirically investigated. This work also proposes an inexpensive experimental setup as a platform to replace atomic force microscopy for force characterization of micro-scale parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Micromechanics and MicroengineeringSame topicForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207