MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002545386 · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.31972

Interactions of coronary artery smooth muscle cells with 3D porous polyurethane scaffolds

2008· article· en· W2002545386 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphanie Grenier, Martin Sandig, David W. Holdsworth, Kibret Mequanint

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScaffoldMaterials scienceVinculinMatrigelTissue engineeringPolyurethaneBiomedical engineeringAdhesionCell adhesionBiophysicsCellComposite materialChemistryBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One strategy in vascular tissue engineering is the design of hybrid vascular substitutes where vascular cells infiltrate biostable porous scaffolds that provides favorable environment for guided cell repopulation and acts as a mechanically supporting layer after the tissue regeneration process. The aim of the present work was to study the interaction of human coronary artery smooth muscle cells (HCASMC) with 3D porous polyurethane scaffolds. We therefore fabricated porous and highly interconnected 3D polyurethane scaffolds that can promote HCASMC attachment, proliferation, and migration. SEM and microCT studies of the fabricated scaffolds showed that the current scaffolds had highly open and interconnected pore structures, with an average porosity of 84%. HCASMC interaction on polyurethane films revealed that cells adhere and express specific marker proteins (vinculin and h-caldesmon). This expression was further enhanced by coating the polyurethane with Matrigel. On uncoated 3D scaffolds, dense spherical aggregates of cells were often encountered with little adhesion of individual cells alongside the struts of the scaffold, independent of the porogens used. In contrast, when cultured on Matrigel-coated scaffolds, cell numbers quickly increased after 14 days and spread along the entire scaffold. At the upper scaffold surface, elongated cells were seen adhering to one another and also to the scaffold surface. These cells were elongated, aligned in parallel and contained abundant F-actin bundles suggesting a differentiated contractile phenotype. Deep into the scaffold, cells were encountered that formed actin-rich lamellipodial extensions spreading along the strut and lacked stress fibers, suggesting active cell migration along the substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part ASame topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207