MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002620010 · doi:10.1300/j073v08n02_04

Benefit Segmentation of the Near-Home Tourism Market: The Case of Upper New York State

2000· article· en· W2002620010 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Yannopoulos, RONALD H. ROTENBERG

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntertainmentMarket segmentationTourismDemographicsMaterialismMarketingBusinessAdvertisingSegmentationState (computer science)GeographySociologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A benefit segmentation study was carried out of a near-home tourism market with data collected from residents of the Upper New York State Region. On the basis of benefits sought, five segments were identified. These segments were called Intangible amenities, Active materialists, Entertainment and comfort, Cultured materialists and Entertainment and shopping. Demographics, life-style, usage of sources of travel information and frequency of travel are used to describe the five benefit segments. The managerial implications of the study are also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Travel & Tourism MarketingSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207