MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002630663 · doi:10.1002/oti.151

Occupational performance in older stroke wheelchair users living at home

2001· article· en· W2002630663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational Therapy International · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersStroke AssociationCanadian Occupational Therapy Foundation
KeywordsStroke (engine)Activities of daily livingOccupational therapyPhysical therapyMedicineWheelchairBathingGerontologyTest (biology)PsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This research aimed to identify problems in occupational performance experienced by survivors of stroke who used a wheelchair, both from their perspective and from the perspective of their caregivers. Sixteen stroke survivors over the age of 65 years who had used a prescribed wheelchair for at least one year, who lived in their own home, who were able to participate in a conversational interview and who had a caregiver willing to participate comprised the sample. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used to identify occupational performance problems and to measure stroke survivors' and caregivers' perceptions of performance. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF) was also used to evaluate the functional performance of stroke survivors from the caregivers' perspective. The frequency and type of problems identified by the COPM were descriptively analysed and compared for both groups. The results of Mann‐Whitney U tests showed no differences in the frequency of self‐care, productivity and leisure problems reported between the two groups. Within‐group comparisons using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test showed that stroke survivors identified significantly more self‐care problems than productivity‐type problems (p=0.001), and more leisure problems than productivity problems (p=0.013). Caregivers identified significantly more self‐care problems than productivity problems (p=0.001). The most common self‐care problems reported by both stroke survivors and caregivers were dressing and bathing. Results suggest a high level of functional disability among the stroke survivors. There was a significant correlation between the score on the SMAF Instrumental Activities of Daily Living subscale and the frequency of caregiver assistance (r=0.747, p=0.001). Addressing the perspectives of both stroke survivors who are wheelchair users and their caregivers in identifying occupational performance problems at home is important for occupational therapists for planning home‐based intervention. Copyright © 2001 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it