Quantification of Condition Monitoring Benefit for Offshore Wind Turbines
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.585
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.605
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Condition monitoring (CM) systems are increasingly installed in wind turbines with the goal of providing component-specific information to wind farm operators, theoretically increasing equipment availability via maintenance and operating actions based on this information. In the offshore case, economic benefits of CM systems are often assumed to be substantial, as compared with experience of onshore systems. Quantifying this economic benefit is non-trivial, especially considering the general lack of utility experience with large offshore wind farms. A quantitative measure of these benefits is therefore of value to utilities and operations and maintenance (O & M) groups involved in planning and operating future offshore wind farms. The probabilistic models presented in this paper employ a variety of methods including discrete-time Markov Chains, Monte Carlo methods and time series modelling. The flexibility and insight provided by this framework captures the necessary operational nuances of this complex problem, thus enabling evaluation of wind turbine CM offshore. The paper concludes with a study of baseline CM benefit, sensitivity to O & M costs and finally effectiveness of the CM system itself.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Wind Engineering
- Topic
- Power System Reliability and Maintenance
- Field
- Engineering
- Canadian institutions
- Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- Offshore wind powerFlexibility (engineering)TurbineWind powerProbabilistic logicReliability engineeringBaseline (sea)Condition monitoringSubmarine pipelineMarkov chainMarine engineeringVariety (cybernetics)EngineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceOperations researchEnvironmental scienceBusiness
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes