MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002671663 · doi:10.1063/1.3275740

Second harmonic generation from graphene and graphitic films

2009· article· en· W2002671663 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneSecond-harmonic generationMaterials scienceAnisotropyIsotropyBilayer grapheneSiliconGraphiteSubstrate (aquarium)OptoelectronicsSurface second harmonic generationBilayerCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyOpticsChemistryComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical second harmonic generation (SHG) of 800 nm, 150 fs fundamental pulses is observed from exfoliated graphene and multilayer graphitic films mounted on an oxidized silicon (001) substrate. The SHG anisotropy is observed as a sample is rotated about the surface normal. For p-polarized fundamental and SHG light, the isotropic SHG from a graphene layer only slightly interferes with the fourfold symmetric response of the underlying substrate, while other samples show a threefold symmetry characteristic of significant SHG in the multilayer graphitic films. The dominance of the threefold anisotropy is maintained from bilayer graphene to bulk graphite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it