MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002678855 · doi:10.1029/2006gl027166

Tomographic evidence for the Eurasian lithosphere subducting beneath south Taiwan

2006· article· en· W2002678855 on OpenAlexaff
Zhi Wang, Dapeng Zhao, Jian Wang, Honn Kao

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubductionGeologyLithosphereEurasian PlateSeismologyPlate tectonicsCollision zoneSeismic tomographyCrustConvergent boundarySlab windowOceanic crustTectonicsGeophysicsMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A tomographic image of the crust and upper mantle beneath the Taiwan Island as derived from local, regional and teleseismic data simultaneously revealed a high‐velocity zone from the surface down to a depth of 300 km, locating beneath south Taiwan (to the south of latitude 24°N). We interpret this high‐velocity zone to be the subducted Eurasian lithosphere. Our result is different from a global tomography study that shows the Eurasian plate subducting beneath most part of the Taiwan Island down to 670 km depth. This down‐going model of the Eurasian lithosphere implies that the tectonic framework of Taiwan has been changing from subduction in the south to collision in the north, which provides geophysical evidence supporting the previous proposed models. The subducted Eurasian lithosphere colliding with the subducted Philippine Sea plate would have contributed to the mountain building, active seismicity and crustal deformation in the study region due to the lower part of the Eurasian continental plate subducted beneath south Taiwan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207