MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002685430 · doi:10.1002/elps.200500215

Capillary‐based solid‐phase extraction with columns prepared using different bead trapping methods

2005· article· en· W2002685430 on OpenAlexaff
Ruixi Xie, Richard D. Oleschuk

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrophoresis · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeadChromatographyFritCapillary electrochromatographyCapillary actionReproducibilitySolid phase extractionPolymerExtraction (chemistry)Materials scienceChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialStationary phase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three approaches of bead immobilization for CEC column preparation in a capillary were examined for SPE. The three approaches included a packed column with a single frit, a packed column with an inlet and outlet frit, and an entrapped column where beads were immobilized within an organic polymer. A direct comparison of SPE/preconcentration of 4,4-difluoro-1,3,5,7,8-pentamethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene and 4,4-difluoro-5,7-dimethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-propionic acid with a 2 cm long bed showed that the entrapped column yielded the best performance in terms of reproducibility and robustness. The room temperature chemistry utilized to form the entrapped column enables the column to be photopatterned anywhere within the capillary without loss in bead functionality, and effectively links individual beads to one another at specific bead-bead and bead-capillary contact points. A 0.5 cm long entrapped bed exhibits high mechanical strength and is able to withstand >4400 psi. The entrapped bed was used to preconcentrate progesterone and beta-estradiol providing signal enhancements of >600. Following preconcentration, the hormones could be separated using CEC. With the current availability of numerous well-characterized chromatographic packing materials and the relative simplicity of the fabrication method, this methodology can be readily adapted to HPLC, CEC, and micro total analysis system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectrophoresisSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207