Possible Charge-Density-Wave/Spin-Density-Wave in the Layered Pnictide−Oxides: Na<sub>2</sub>Ti<sub>2</sub>Pn<sub>2</sub>O (Pn = As, Sb)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The compounds Na 2 Ti 2 Pn 2 O (Pn = As, Sb) crystallize in the anti-K 2 NiF 4 structure type in the space group, I 4/ mmm, with Z = 2 and the lattice parameters a = 4.0810(9) Å and c = 15.311(3) Å for the As analogue at 310 K and a = 4.160(2) Å and c = 16.558(7) Å for the Sb analogue at 150 K. The structure consists of edge-shared [Ti 4/2 Pn 2 O 4/4 ] 2 - layers separated by double layers of Na + . These compounds exhibit an anomalous transition in the temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility at = 330 K for the As analogue and = 120 K for the Sb analogue. Temperature-dependent powder neutron diffraction has been performed to investigate the magnetic spin ordering and structure symmetry breakdown of the compounds; however, no scattering due to magnetic spin ordering or symmetry change has been detected. The temperature-dependent electrical resistivity of these compounds also exhibits an anomaly reminiscent of CDW (charge-density-wave)/SDW (spin-density-wave) materials. The As analogue shows an insulator-to-insulator transition around 135 K whereas the Sb analogue shows a metal-to-metal transition around 120 K that corresponds well to the onset of the anomaly in the magnetic susceptibility. The similarity and difference in the physical properties between the As and Sb analogues as well as related compounds will be discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it