MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002732190 · doi:10.1142/s0218957709002249

AN IMPAIRMENT-BASED INTERVENTION FOR A PATIENT WITH NON-SPECIFIC BILATERAL HIP PAIN: CLINICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL OUTCOMES

2009· article· en· W2002732190 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marie A. Johanson, Bruce Greenfield, Brenda L. Greene, Thomas A. Abelew

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Musculoskeletal Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyIliopsoasRange of motionWOMACPhysical medicine and rehabilitationGaitMuscle weaknessPhysical examinationOsteoarthritisSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study design: Case study. Background: To date, there is little research that has examined the association of impairments at the hip with cumulative trauma syndromes of the hip. The purposes of this case report are to: (1) describe clinical outcomes for a patient with non-specific bilateral musculoskeletal hip pain associated with recreational walking, (2) explore the relationship between this patient's impairments and her cumulative trauma syndrome at the hip, and (3) integrate biomechanical analysis with this patient's clinical diagnosis. Case description: The patient was a 28-year-old female research assistant who reported anterior bilateral hip pain during recreational walking. After examination, the physical therapist diagnosed primary impairments of hip pain, limited hip flexion range of motion (ROM), and weakness of hip musculature, resulting in her ambulation limitations. Intervention consisted of a home exercise program (HEP) designed to strengthen the iliopsoas, gluteus maximus, and gluteus medius (specifically, the posterior portion), increase extensibility of the IT Band and medial hamstrings, and promote posterior glide of the proximal femur. The patient's HEP was the only intervention she received. There were follow-up telephone conversations, but no clinical re-examination for ten weeks. The patient performed the HEP a total of 41 days over the ten week period. Biomechanical gait analysis was performed pre- and post-intervention. Outcomes: Following intervention, the patient was pain-free during recreational walking, and passive hip flexion ROM and manual muscle testing (MMT) grades of hip musculature improved. Global score on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) improved ten points. Motion analysis, force plate analysis, and electromyography (EMG) showed that maximum hip extension decreased, maximum hip flexion increased, maximum ground reaction force increased, activation of the gluteus maximus increased, while activation of the gluteus medius and tensor fascia latae (TFL) decreased following the intervention. Discussion: This patient's changes in muscle activity following a HEP appear largely consistent with improved symptoms based on theoretical descriptions of a common muscle imbalance (shortened and overactive TFL and weakness of the gluteus maximus and posterior portion of the gluteus medius), thought to contribute to increased femoral medial rotation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Musculoskeletal ResearchSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207