Vegetatively reproducing fungi in three genera of the Parmeliaceae share divergent algal partners
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The taxonomic pattern of algal association with lichen fungi may be explained by the fungal selection of algae that are available in the habitat, genetic compatibility between symbionts or mode of reproduction of the lichen. This study examined algal selection among species in the genera Evernia, Pseudevernia and Imshaugia of the Parmeliaceae using nucleotide sequences of the algal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA), the algal actin gene, the 1512 group I intron and secondary RNA structures. The hypothesis of high selectivity within one species of Evernia examined, E. mesomorpha, was supported suggesting that E. mesomorpha exhibits high selectivity toward its photobiont, which is not shared with other species of lichenized fungi in the same habitat. The eight strongly supported ITS clades correspond with two newly described algal species broadly known as Trebouxia jamesii s.l. and one existing species, T. simplex. The possibility of lateral algal transfer is discussed with reference to algal availability and mode of reproduction of the lichen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".