Evacuee behaviors and factors affecting the tsunami trip generation model: A case study in phang-nga, Thailand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A significant amount of research has focused on various types of evacuations, but little attention has been given to tsunami evacuation in the past. The purpose of this study was to investigate evacuee behaviors and factors affecting tsunami evacuation. The intention was also to analyze tsunami trip generation models. A data set of evacuation behavior was collected in an affected area, Baan Namkhem, Phang-Nga Province, Thailand, following the Indian Ocean tsunami of December 26, 2004. The study was undertaken to determine evacuee response patterns in different conditions. Tsunami trip generation models were employed, using a binary logistic regression technique, to estimate the likelihood of evacuees being involved in each response pattern. It was found that the patterns of evacuee response to an emergency are different among the three conditions. Six factors (education level, ownership of the residence, distance to nearest seashore, disaster knowledge, number of household members, and status of respondent — permanent or transient) were found to be statistically significant. The results of this study can be used to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of future evacuation systems in Thailand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it