The Effect of Dissolving Gases or Solids in Water Droplets Boiling on a Hot Surface
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We conducted experiments on the effect of dissolving either a gas (carbon dioxide) or a solid salt (sodium carbonate or sodium bicarbonate) in water droplets boiling on a hot stainless steel surface. Substrate temperatures were varied from 100°C to 300°C. We recorded the boiling of droplets with a video system, and photographed droplet impact using short-duration flash photography. At surface temperatures that were too low to initiate nucleate boiling, dissolved salts were found to reduce the evaporation rate since they lower the vapor pressure of water. Dissolved gas had the opposite effect: it came out of solution and formed bubbles in the liquid, enhancing evaporation. In the nucleate boiling regime dissolved carbon dioxide enhanced heat transfer by a small amount. However, sodium carbonate prevented coalescence of vapor bubbles and produced foaming in the droplet, greatly enhancing heat transfer and reducing the droplet lifetime to approximately half that of a pure water drop. Sodium bicarbonate, which decomposes to give carbon dioxide and sodium carbonate when heated, produced an even larger enhancement of heat transfer. When the surface temperature was raised above the Leidenfrost temperature of water, droplets went into film boiling and bounced off the surface following impact. Dissolved carbon dioxide was found to suppress heterogeneous bubble formation in the droplet during impact. However, dissolved salts promoted bubble formation and led to droplet break-up during impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it