MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002851440 · doi:10.1190/tle29050546.1

Geophysics field education: Better learning by doing

2010· article· en· W2002851440 on OpenAlexaff
Robert R. Stewart, Shuhab D. Khan, Stuart A. Hall, Christopher L. Liner, Joe Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeography Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuriosityAdventureProsperityField (mathematics)Natural (archaeology)SoulGeophysicsResource (disambiguation)Earth scienceEngineering ethicsRemote sensingGeologyEnvironmental ethicsEngineeringComputer scienceEpistemologyPsychologyArtificial intelligencePolitical sciencePaleontologyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fascination with natural phenomena, a love of the outdoors, and an interest in using advanced technologies draw many to geophysics. In addition, the soul of an exploration geophysicist will likely harbor an energetic curiosity along with the spirit to search for something valuable. Inherent in this quest and the practice of geophysics is a field survey—with its adventure, camaraderie, and measurements. The survey is usually about imaging the subsurface to discover or define something buried. Geophysicists are thus called to make a contribution toward scientific understanding of the Earth and, via conscientious resource recovery, an improvement in prosperity. Central to this endeavor is making observations and acquiring data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.010
Scholarly communication0.0150.018
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicGeography Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207