Effect of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration on endotoxin-induced acute lung injury of the piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis filtration (CVVHDF) on cardiopulmonary function and clearance of inflammatory mediators in piglets with endotoxin-induced acute lung injury. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: An animal laboratory in a tertiary care pediatric center. SUBJECTS: : Eighteen piglets, weighing 6-8 kg. INTERVENTIONS: The piglets were anesthetized, ventilated, and received an intravenous infusion of 150 μg/kg of endotoxin. They were then randomly divided into three groups: control group (n = 6) received Ringer's lactate solution; the heparin group (n = 6) received heparin infusion plus Ringer's lactate solution; and the CVVHDF group (n = 6) received CVVHDF plus heparin infusion and Ringer's lactate solution. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Parameters measured simultaneously were: heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, pulse contour cardiac index, cardiac function index, left ventricular contractile index, and systemic vascular resistance index; extra vascular lung water index, respiratory rate, dynamic pulmonary compliance, airway resistance, Pao2/Fio2 ratio, serum tumor necrosis factor-α, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor. Lung tissue was obtained for pathologic lung injury scoring and wet/dry weight ratio. Endotoxin challenge decreased oxygenation and pulmonary mechanics, suppressed cardiac function, increased extravascular lung water, and elevated serum inflammatory mediators (tumor necrosis factor-α and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor). After CVVHDF, pulmonary function and oxygenation improved (Pao2/Fio2, 291.5 ± 75.9 vs. 217.2 ± 45.4, respectively, p < .05); arterial blood pressure and cardiac function were restored (pulse contour cardiac index, 3.95 ± 0.52 L/min/m(2) vs. 2.69 ± 0.49 L/min/m(2), respectively, p < .05); extravascular lung water decreased, and serum inflammatory markers also decreased. Lung injury score improved and wet/dry weight ratio decreased. CONCLUSION: Early CVVHDF has a beneficial effect on acute lung injury in piglets and is associated with a reduction in inflammatory cytokines, improving pulmonary function and hemodynamics and decreasing extravascular lung water and lung damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".