MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002865398 · doi:10.1021/ie0608861

Kinetic Studies of Reaction between Sodium Borohydride and Methanol, Water, and Their Mixtures

2007· article· en· W2002865398 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersAUTO21 Network of Centres of ExcellenceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSodium borohydrideChemistryMethanolHydrogenInorganic chemistryGravimetric analysisSodiumOrder of reactionKineticsCatalysisReaction rate constantOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports the kinetics of hydrogen generation from the reaction between sodium borohydride and methanol, water, and their mixtures over a temperature range between −20 and +50 °C. Hydrogen generation was found to obey a first-order rate law with respect to sodium borohydride concentration for each of the four reacting mixtures of methanol, “nearly dry” methanol (2:1 water to sodium borohydride mole ratio), “wet” methanol (10:1 water to sodium borohydride ratio), and water, with activation energies of 53.0 ± 3.4, 52.3 ± 9.5, 36.1 ± 2.8, and 86.6 ± 8.0 kJ/mol, respectively. Methanolysis of sodium borohydride was shown to be a feasible method for low-temperature hydrogen generation. However, this noncatalytic reaction system exhibited large lag time and slow reaction kinetics at low temperatures. Our study indicates that the reaction system based on sodium borohydride and the nearly dry methanol can be a potential high gravimetric density hydrogen storage system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it