Microhabitat utilisation, home ranges, and movement patterns of the collared lemming (<i>Dicrostonyx groenlandicus</i>) in the central Canadian Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated patterns of home ranges, movements, and microhabitat use of the collared lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus) on Kent Peninsula, Northwest Territories. Eleven animals were fitted with radio collars and intensively radio-tracked for 2 months. Males and females differed in their home ranges and movement patterns. Males moved, on average, 47.4 m and females 10.5 m in a 2-h period. Corresponding to the larger movements, males had larger home ranges than did females and the degree of overlap was greater in males. In both sexes activity was centred on burrows, but this was more evident in females. Collared lemmings differentially used available microhabitats, preferring areas with larger hummocks, a larger number of burrows, and greater cover of Salix lanata. It is suggested that this pattern of microhabitat use is related to reducing detection and capture by predators. Collared lemmings appear to be highly conservative in their patterns of habitat use and home ranges across their distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".