MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002921350 · doi:10.1145/2486159.2486178

Parallel rotor walks on finite graphs and applications in discrete load balancing

2013· article· en· W2002921350 on OpenAlexaff
Hoda Akbari, Petra Berenbrink

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecurity tokenRotor (electric)Computer scienceNode (physics)GraphProcess (computing)Topology (electrical circuits)MathematicsComputer networkTheoretical computer scienceCombinatoricsEngineeringElectrical engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the parallel rotor walk process, which works as follows: Consider a graph along with an arbitrary distribution of tokens over its nodes. Every node is equipped with a rotor that points to its neighbours in a fixed circular order. In each round, every node distributes all of its tokens using the rotor. One token is allocated to the neighbour pointed at by the rotor, then the rotor moves to the subsequent neighbour, and so on, until no token remains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCellular Automata and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207