MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002923583 · doi:10.1159/000180971

Somatostatin as a Physiological Regulator of Pulsatile Growth Hormone Secretion

2008· review· en· W2002923583 on OpenAlexaff
Gloria Shaffer Tannenbaum

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomatostatinRegulatorPulsatile flowSecretionEndocrinologyInternal medicineGrowth hormoneHormoneBiologyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Somatostatin plays an important role in the regulation of the episodic and ultradian rhythm of growth hormone (GH) secretion. Passive immunization of rats with specific antibodies to the 14 and 28 amino acid sequences caused a significant GH elevation. The fact that somatostatin antiserum was unable to block episodic GH surges indicates that this hormone's release must be regulated by a dual mechanism. Indeed, GH-releasing factor (GRF) seems to be instrumental in the maintenance of pulsatile GH secretion. Moreover, exogenous GRF induced a further GH increase predominantly during the period of active secretion. Neutralization of endogenous somatostatin eliminated this time-dependent effect, indicating that this peptide blocks periodical spontaneous GH release. Food deprivation and changes in glucose homeostasis virtually obliterate the ultradian GH rhythm. In this context, peripheral somatostatin seems to play an important role. Also the central GRF/somatostatin interplay is responsible for a short-loop feedback control on pituitary somatotrops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHormone ResearchSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207