MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002927677 · doi:10.1080/07060660609507276

Night-time spore deposition of the fusarium head blight pathogen,<i>Gibberella zeae</i>, in rotational wheat fields

2006· article· en· W2002927677 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David G. Schmale, Gary C. Bergstrom, Elson J. Shields

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsGibberella zeaeSporeFusariumGibberellaDeposition (geology)BiologyHorticultureBotanyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many fungal plant pathogens rely on atmospheric motion systems for transport. The movement of these pathogens in the atmosphere is characterized by processes of liberation, drift, and deposition. We observed temporal patterns of viable spore deposition of Gibberella zeae, causal agent of fusarium head blight (FHB) of wheat, over rotational wheat fields (with no visible residues of corn or wheat, potential inoculum sources of G. zeae) in Aurora, New York, United States. Viable, airborne spores of G. zeae were collected on Petri plates containing selective medium placed 30 cm above wheat canopies. Over 40 000 viable spores of G. zeae were collected over a total of 73 day (6:00 am to 8:00 pm) or night (8:00 pm to 6:00 am) sampling periods in 3 years (2002, 2004, and 2005). The vast majority of the spores was collected at night (94% in 2002, 86% in 2004, and 82% in 2005). Viable spores were deposited in all but one sampling period spanning spike emergence through kernel milk stages of local wheat. Seven major deposition events (>50 colonies, on average, per Petri plate) were observed, all at night, and three of these were coincident with rainfall. In a single wheat field in 2004, viable spores of G. zeae were collected every 2 h throughout the night (starting at 8:00 pm) for six consecutive nights. Overall, 87% of the spores were deposited from 12:00 pm until 6:00 am, with most of the spores deposited between 4:00 am and 6:00 am. In 2005, viable spores of G. zeae were collected over variable landscape environments (two winter wheat fields, two soybean fields, one alfalfa hay field, and one fallow corn field) within 1 km2 area. Temporal patterns of viable spore deposition were virtually identical over all of the landscape environments, suggesting that spores were being deposited over kilometer distances from a well-mixed atmospheric source of inoculum. Atmospheric settling (gravitational fallout of spores) coinciding with the development of an inversion layer may explain the high degree of spore deposition at night. Vertical mixing and the presence of a mixed or turbulent layer during the daylight hours may account for the relatively low number of spores collected during the day. The deposition of spores of G. zeae primarily at night in rotational wheat fields raises some interesting questions about the origin of inoculum for epidemics of FHB. Our results suggest that spore deposition may be separated from spore release in both time and space. The cumulative exposure of wheat spikes to airborne spores of G. zeae, and the deposition of these spores mainly at night, should be considered in future prediction models and management strategies for fusarium head blight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207