Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study was conducted on the emulsion copolymerization of vinyl acetate and butyl acrylate in a tubular reactor. It was performed at a constant temperature of 60°C and at different fluid velocities and feed compositions. Conversion, particle size distribution, and copolymer composition were measured, respectively, with gravimetric method, laser light scattering, and nuclear magnetic resonance. Maximum conversions were found for each of the monomer compositions; this maximum conversion varied, however, with the recipe used. The amount of butyl acrylate has a direct effect on the number of particles and on the final conversion. In lower levels of butyl acrylate particle size distribution is wide and bimodal. High levels of butyl acrylate leads to narrow and monomodal particle size distribution. Therefore the level of butyl acrylate and the velocity of fluid flowing inside the tube have strong effects on the shape (monomodal- bimodal) and the width of particle size distributions. This effect may vary at different levels of butyl acrylate and flow rate. The results obtained from copolymer composition show that an alternating block copolymer is made during the reaction. © 2000 John Wiley
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".