MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2002942860 · doi:10.5555/545381.545459

Tree exploration with little memory

2002· article· en· W2002942860 on OpenAlexaff
Krzysztof Diks, Pierre Fraigniaud, Evangelos Kranakis, Andrzej Pelc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNode (physics)Binary logarithmDegree (music)Bounded functionTree (set theory)Computer scienceTask (project management)Upper and lower boundsTime complexityCombinatoricsMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robot with k-bit memory has to explore a tree whose nodes are unlabeled and edge ports are locally labeled at each node. The robot has no a priori knowledge of the topology of the tree or of its size, and its aim is to traverse all the edges. While O(logA) bits of memory suffice to explore any tree of maximum degree A if stopping is not required, we show that bounded memory is not sufficient to explore with stop all trees of bounded degree (indeed f~(logloglog n) bits of memory are needed for some such trees of size n). For the more demanding task requiring to stop at the starting node after completing exploration, we show a sharper lower bound f~(log n) on required memory size, and present an algorithm to accomplish this task with O(log 2 n)-bit memory, for all n-node trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207