New image analysis methods for the study of mixing patterns in stirred tanks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A method of treating data acquired with the planar laser‐induced fluorescence technique has been developed to visualize the topology of two‐dimensional concentration fields and to describe the dynamics of the coherent mixing structures identified. This method is based on a conditional binary transformation of the local concentration data, combined with a joint probability calculation. The methodology has been used to investigate the mixing in a stirred tank, at two injection port locations (in the bulk and in the impeller stream region). With bulk injection, a “folding phenomenon” of the coherent mixing structure was detected. Away from this port, large‐scale spatially periodic motion was identified, with a characteristic time of oscillation of the order of 2 to 3 s. With injection in the impeller stream region, no spatial instabilities of the coherent structure were detected. Local oscillations of the coherent mixing structure were found both on short and long time‐scales (i.e., ˜1 and ˜80 s).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".