Near-UV Induced Interstrand Cross-Links in Anthraquinone−DNA Duplexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anthraquinone (AQ) has been extensively used as a photosensitizer to study charge transfer in DNA. Near-UV photolysis of AQ induces electron abstraction in oligonucleotides leading to AQ radical anions and base radical cations. In general, this reaction is followed by the transport of base radical cations to sites of low oxidation potential, that is, GG, and conversion of G radical cations to DNA breaks. Here, we show that AQ also produces interstrand cross-links in DNA duplexes. About half of the cross-links collapse to single strands in hot piperidine treatment. The structure of stable interstrand cross-links was deduced by MS, NMR, and sequence substitution. The cross-links consist of a covalent link between the methyl group of T on one strand with either C6 or C7 of AQ on the other strand. The formation of interstrand cross-links decreased in O2 compared to deoxygenated solutions. In the presence of O2, the yield of breaks at GG doublets was 10-fold greater than that of cross-links for end tethered AQ, while cross-links exceeded breaks for centrally located AQ. The formation of stable cross-links can be explained by initial charge transfer from T to excited AQ, deprotonation of T radical cations, and condensation of the latter species with AQ radicals. These studies reveal a novel pathway of damage in the photolysis of AQ-DNA duplexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".