MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003011996 · doi:10.5539/ass.v10n22p280

Concept of Human and Nature in Kazakh Poetry

2014· article· en· W2003011996 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Akbota Abiyr, Perizat Berikbolova

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Sociopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntithesisKazakhLyricsPoetryPerceptionEnergy (signal processing)LiteratureAestheticsHuman beingEpistemologyPsychologyPhilosophyHistorySociologyArtLinguisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the early age, the human has been attempting to understand the mysteries of life and to find the answer to the eternal question through interaction with the surrounding nature. It was the original decision of the human to attempt discovering the many secrets of the elemental forces occupying the enormous environment, which he feared. The first teacher of the human was the nature, and the first thing it taught the human was the ability to perceive.In the XXI century, a young generation of poets came in who continued to pursue what their seniors had begun and were able to give it a new breath and dynamic energy. In lyrics, it takes great poetical perception to amalgamate the human and the nature and describe them beautifully by way of antithesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicCultural and Sociopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207