MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003022189 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2002.5745497

Discrimination of pathological voices using an adaptive time-frequency approach

2002· article· en· W2003022189 on OpenAlex
Karthikeyan Umapathy, Sridhar Krishnan, Vijay Parsa, Donald G. Jamieson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVoice and Speech Disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOctave (electronics)Speech recognitionComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)SIGNAL (programming language)Function (biology)Speech processingPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceAcousticsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic measures of vocal function are routinely used for the assessment of disordered voice, and for monitoring patient's progress over the course of therapy. In current clinical practice, acoustic measures extracted from sustained vowels are used for vocal function characterization. However, the measures derived from continuous speech samples are required for accurate assessment of voice quality. In this paper, a time-frequency approach for pathological voice discrimination has been proposed. The speech signals were decomposed using an adaptive time-frequency transform algorithm, and the signal decomposition parameters such as the octave (scale) maximum, octave mean, energy rate, and length ratio were analyzed using the maximum likelihood method and Jack-knife algorithm for classification. A classification accuracy of 90% was obtained with a database of 40 speech signals (20 normal and 20 pathological cases).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it