MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003042569 · doi:10.1116/1.582237

Photoconductor selection for digital flat panel x-ray image detectors based on the dark current

2000· article· en· W2003042569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGa2O3 and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDark currentX-ray detectorPhysicsBand gapFermi levelOpticsFluoroscopyDetectorPhotonDetective quantum efficiencyPhoton energyOptoelectronicsElectronImage qualityImage (mathematics)Nuclear physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a flat panel direct conversion x-ray image detector in which a photoconductor is used to directly convert absorbed x-ray photons to collectable electron hole pairs. The storage capacitor at each pixel stores a quantity of charge proportional to the incident radiation. The charge stored at each pixel is read out every Δt seconds. Based on a condition for a minimal dynamic constraint, we have examined the corresponding range of constraints on the material properties to establish approximate x-ray photoconductor selection criteria. We consider requirements for radiology and fluoroscopy in which Δt=1 and 1/30 s, respectively. When the electrical contacts are totally blocking, the dark current is limited by bulk thermal generation. Minimum band gap Eg requirements depend on the concentration of defects Nd around the Fermi level and their recombination cross section Sr. For single crystal photoconductors with a neutral-defect concentration of the order of ∼1014 cm−3, we need Eg>1.5 eV for fluoroscopy and Eg>1.7 eV for radiology. For high purity single crystals, these band gap values can be lower, for example, Eg≈1.42 eV (GaAs) requires Nd<1012 cm−3. In the case of amorphous semiconductors, the dark current is due to the emission of carriers from a distribution of localized states in the energy gap. For a maximum integrated concentration of ∼1016 cm−3 of localized states around the Fermi level, calculations suggest Eg>1.75 eV for fluoroscopy and Eg>1.9 eV for radiology; amorphous selenium readily satisfies these conditions. When the dark current is controlled to thermal emission from the metal electrode into the semiconductor over a potential barrier φB (i.e., bulk thermal generation of carriers is negligible) then we find that the required Schottky barrier φB can be expressed in terms of the band gap Eg. For Schottky barriers φB∼0.6Eg, Eg>1.8 eV for fluoroscopy and >2.0 eV for radiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it