Comorbilidad entre abuso/dependencia de drogas y el distrés psicológico, Brasilia - Brasil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo del estudio fue investigar la prevalencia de distrés psicológico en pacientes atendidos en centros públicos especializados en alcohol y drogas en Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brasil. Es un estudio de prevalencia, en pacientes atendidos en los Centros de Atención Psicosocial - alcohol y drogas. Fue realizado auto-diligenciamiento de un cuestionario, o entrevista en pacientes analfabetos. Fue utilizada la escala K-10 de distrés psicológico. Los resultados muestran que 165 personas participaron, 90% hombres, edad promedio 42.9 (mediana=43). Fue relatado diagnóstico previo de depresión en 40.8% y ansiedad en 37.9%. Hubo diagnóstico actual de depresión y ansiedad en 42.9% y 48.8%, respectivamente. K-10 mostró que 31% tenían niveles severos y ~39% muy severos de distrés. Se concluye que los niveles encontrados de distrés psicológico (severo y muy severo, ~70%), cuya escala es más sensible para ansiedad y depresión, son mayores que los relatados en estudios internacionales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".