Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early in 2002 the National Sculpture Factory (NSF) and Meridian Theatre Company in Cork initiated a cross-disciplinary collaboration between the writer-director Johnny Hanrahan (artistic director of Meridian) and the visual artist-sculptor Daphne Wright. Hanrahan had selected Wright as an artist with whom he would like to collaborate. Wright was subsequently invited to participate, and accepted. Mary McCarthy (then director of the NSF) suggested inviting Jools Gilson-Ellis to engage in a critical reflection on the project. This was agreed, and Gilson-Ellis was invited to work on the project, and also accepted. In March/April 2002, the NSF applied for two awards from the Ans Council: a Commissions Award to allow Daphne Wright to develop a collaboration with Johnny Hanrahan, and a Critical Reflection Award to allow Jools Gilson-Ellis to write about the work. Both awards were granted. Hanrahan and Wright began tlleir collaboration in the spring of 2002, and Gilson-Ellis joined them in the summer of the same year. The initial context and starting point for the collaboration between Hanrahan and Wright was the city as a "universal concept idea" and Cork City in particular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".