MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003118255 · doi:10.1517/14728222.2012.668185

14-3-3 zeta as novel molecular target for cancer therapy

2012· review· en· W2003118255 on OpenAlexaff
Ajay Matta, KW Michael Siu, Ranju Ralhan

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topic14-3-3 protein interactions
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoIONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada)York University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerCancer therapyCancer cellTargeted therapyCancer researchSignal transductionMedicineBioinformaticsBiologyInternal medicineCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: 14-3-3ζ acts as a central hub in signaling networks, which promotes cell proliferation, adhesion and survival and inhibits apoptosis in multiple cancers. Development of inhibitors or agents that interfere with 14-3-3ζ-dependent signaling networks are likely to serve as novel molecular agents for targeted cancer therapy. AREAS COVERED: The role of 14-3-3ζ in cancer and its potential as a novel molecular target for therapy. The involvement of 14-3-3ζ in chemoresistance in multiple cancers provides a rationale for developing novel molecular therapies targeting this protein for more effective cancer management. The keywords used to conduct the literature search for this paper were '14-3-3/14-3-3zeta and cancer', '14-3-3 structure', '14-3-3 inhibitors', '14-3-3 cancer prognosis', '14-3-3 and cancer therapy', 'role/ functions of 14-3-3'. EXPERT OPINION: 14-3-3ζ is a central cellular hub protein regulating multiple signaling pathways involved in cancer development, progression and therapeutic resistance. Thus, 14-3-3ζ may serve as a novel molecular target for cancer therapy. New approaches including synthetic and/or natural inhibitors that interfere with 14-3-3ζ-client interactions need to be developed for effective cancer therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic TargetsSame topic14-3-3 protein interactionsFrench-language works237,207