Review of the rove beetle species of the subtribe Gyrophaenina Kraatz (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) from New Brunswick, Canada: new species, provincial records and bionomic information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A comprehensive species review of the genera Gyrophaena Mannerheim and Eumicrota Casey is presented for New Brunswick, Canada. Twenty-four species of Gyrophaena are reported from New Brunswick including two new species, and two species of Eumicrota. Nineteen previously described species are newly recorded in New Brunswick, eight of which are newly reported in Canada. New species are: Gyrophaena meduxnekeagensis Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n., and G. pseudocriddlei Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n. New Canadian records are: G. chippewa Seevers, G. corruscula Erichson, G. dybasi Seevers, G. fuscicollis Casey, G. illiana Seevers, G. involuta Casey, G. laetula Casey, and G. lobata Casey. New records for New Brunswick: G. fuscicollis Casey, G. caseyi Seevers, G. chippewa Seevers, E. corruscula Erichson, G. criddlei Casey, G. dybasi Seevers, G. flavicornis Melsheimer, G. gaudens Casey, G. gilvicollis Casey, G. gracilis Seevers, G. illiana Seevers, G. involuta Casey, G. laetula Casey, G. lobata Casey, G. sculptipennis Casey, E. socia (Erichson), G. subnitens Casey, G. uteana Casey, and G. vitrina Casey. All species are documented by colour habitus images, black/white images of genital structures, and distributional maps. All female genital structures are presented and illustrated here for the first time. A key to the New Brunswick species is provided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.017 | 0.033 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".